Families whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion say that indecision over how to address the issue is creating avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their departed family.
The council have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.
A newly published study on the situation sets out a series of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer locations. Authorities say it is for the community to determine how to move forward.
“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They intended this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”
Estimates indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.
A local business owner recalled a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, along with its church and graveyard.
“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for treasures. It’s completely undignified.”
“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”
Further up the shoreline lies the grave of a ex-soldier who died while working abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be moved.
“It truly disturb me to consider this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”
In her view, new interments should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”
An absence of consensus over the timing and method to handle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.
Some want more coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to proceed for now. Others contend the time for moving graves is approaching.
“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”
A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with residents.”
It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the options. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”
“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. It requires good community discussions to find the right answers for each community.”
The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the physical loss of sacred ground.
A certified financial planner with over 15 years of experience, specializing in retirement planning and wealth management for UK residents.
News
News
News
News
News
Tina Whitehead
Tina Whitehead
Tina Whitehead
Tina Whitehead
Tina Whitehead